rickvs: (Default)
[personal profile] rickvs
With my limited knowledge of the law here in the United States, I can't come up with a legal objection to the following proposal:

What if both sides in any trial (criminal or civil) were allowed to toss as much money for paying their lawyers into a pot as they liked ...at which point the money was split fifty-fifty towards each party's representation? Seems that that would keep one side from railroading the other, and I don't particularly have a moral problem with the idea.

My wife says I'm just a socialist at heart, which I don't agree with, but wanted to solicit feedback.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

September 2016

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 14th, 2026 02:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios